The Fediverse deserves a dumb graphical client
by speckx on 4/14/2026, 3:42:48 PM
https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/the-fediverse-deserves-a-dumb-graphical-client.md
Comments
by: righthand
Wouldn’t removing the dumb excessiveness of most graphical clients, make it a “smart” client?
4/14/2026, 6:13:19 PM
by: ndegruchy
In addition to this guys app, there's also brutaldon[1]. A web1.0 client that serves as a web interface for mastodon.<p>[1]: <a href="https://brutaldon.org/about" rel="nofollow">https://brutaldon.org/about</a>
4/14/2026, 4:11:43 PM
by: floren
Sidebar, am I alone in absolutely hating "smol"?
4/14/2026, 5:20:52 PM
by: mindslight
First, I take issue with the idea of calling something "dumb" for trying to avoid modern app bloat, even as marketing. I understand the precedent of a "smart" device being something that backhauls your personal information to the surveillance industry (decidedly not smart!). But still, can we find a better name for the concept? "Native" ? "Lean" ? It shouldn't be about giving up some purported betterness of bloaty software, but rather about the benefits we get by doing so.<p>Second, it's kind of depressing that this is still tying itself to web technologies. What about a straightforward desktop client that uses a native desktop toolkit? I get that this is a difficult problem because a lot of protocols bake in reliance on web technologies and whatnot, but if I am looking for a simple graphical client I would expect something that aims to not simply dump content into webviews, nevermind still being dependent on an actual browser!
4/14/2026, 5:00:51 PM
by: guywithahat
Somewhat unrelated but these sorts of clients are becoming great targets for AI coding. I've been able to create minimal gtk C++ apps for small sites with good API's in relatively little time, and they run beautifully since they're native apps.<p>I like the project though, it'd be cool to have a picture of what it looks like either on the git page or the blog article but I like the spirit of the project.
4/14/2026, 5:30:49 PM
by: superkuh
It really does. But also, having to do this points out a glaring flaw in the design of the fediverse websites. They're applications and not documents. They require executing complex code from unknown third parties just to show a bit of text and some multi-media. This isn't needed at all. And it wasn't like this till mastodon v3 when they broke it.<p>Despite <i>requiring</i> Javascript execution mastodon actually does have the post contents of a URL in the hidden meta-content HTML header on the page where it scolds you and blocks you for not executing their arbitrary code. All they'd have to do is put that same text in the HTML as actual <p> text. And it's not just mastodon instances, the other fediverse "applications' are just as silly in their intentional breaking of accessibility for no reason.
4/14/2026, 3:57:40 PM