Hacker News Viewer

Adobe modifies hosts file to detect whether Creative Cloud is installed

by rglullis on 4/6/2026, 5:38:30 PM

https://www.osnews.com/story/144737/adobe-secretly-modifies-your-hosts-file-for-the-stupidest-reason/

Comments

by: matsemann

Oh well, as a teenager, blocking adobe servers in hosts file was how you got to "phone activation" and could generate a code. So I guess we're even, heh.

4/6/2026, 6:54:42 PM


by: lousken

How is defender not flagging this? Changing hosts file should raise alarms

4/6/2026, 6:02:45 PM


by: Terr_

Recycling a comment from prior discussion (4 days, 68 points, 13 comments): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47617463">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47617463</a><p>_______<p>Oh <i>helllll</i> no. Let&#x27;s imagine an analogy for Adobe leadership:<p>1. You hired a night janitor to clean and vacuum your executive offices.<p>2. That janitor secretly stops at every desk-phone to alter the settings of voicemail accounts.<p>3. After the change, any external caller can dial a certain sequence to get a message of &quot;Yes, this office was serviced by Adobe Janitorial!&quot;<p>What&#x27;s your reaction when you discover it? Do you chuckle and say something like &quot;boys will be boys&quot;? No! You have a panic-call, Facilities revokes access, IT starts checking for other unauthorized surprises, HR looks into terminating contracts, and Legal advises whether you need to pursue data-breach notifications or lawsuits or criminal charges.<p>* Is it acceptable because they had <i>some</i> permission to touch objects in the rooms? No.<p>* Is it acceptable because the final effect is innocuous? No.<p>* Is it acceptable because the employment contract had some vague sentence about &quot;enhancing office communication experiences&quot;? No.<p>* Is it acceptable if they were just dumb instead of malicious? No.<p>No person that would blithely cross those lines can be trusted near your stuff, full-stop.

4/6/2026, 6:19:04 PM


by: OptionOfT

Can&#x27;t even reproduce it when setting location to Belgium, or CA or AZ.<p>I must be missing something.

4/6/2026, 6:46:25 PM


by: vondur

If you don&#x27;t like Adobe modifying your hosts file then I&#x27;d not use them. The checking for the software this way is kinda interesting though.

4/6/2026, 6:06:31 PM


by: ramon156

To be fair, to crack <i>all</i> adobe products requires a few reg keys. It&#x27;s wild that they have just given up on pirates.

4/6/2026, 6:28:04 PM


by: hypeatei

Looks like they got a wildcard certificate for *.creativecloud.adobe.com[0] so that the HTTPS connection works and so they don&#x27;t have to publish DNS records for the &quot;detect-ccd&quot; subdomain to obtain a cert. Pretty neat setup, but also kinda hacky.<p>0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;crt.sh&#x2F;?q=creativecloud.adobe.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;crt.sh&#x2F;?q=creativecloud.adobe.com</a>

4/6/2026, 6:46:42 PM


by: j45

Make affinity sound like a smarter and smarter choice.

4/6/2026, 6:53:55 PM


by: ChrisArchitect

[dupe] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47617463">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47617463</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47624990">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47624990</a>

4/6/2026, 6:10:25 PM


by: jameskraus

Honestly a pretty nifty way to detect if it&#x27;s installed. I&#x27;m sure this can power a lot of nice features, like linking directly into adobe products if they&#x27;re installed.

4/6/2026, 6:14:34 PM


by: cromka

&gt; for a very stupid reason.<p>I cannot stomach Thom&#x27;s articles. So borderline judgmental, holier than thou, feels like he only writes whenever there&#x27;s something to criticize.<p>No, it&#x27;s not a stupid reason. Reason is OK, the execution is controversial.

4/6/2026, 5:55:11 PM