Hacker News Viewer

IPv6 address, as a sentence you can remember

by LorenDB on 4/1/2026, 11:22:57 PM

https://sentence2ipv6.tib3rius.com/

Comments

by: 1970-01-01

If you&#x27;re remembering your IPv6 address you&#x27;re doing IPv6 wrong. In fact, it&#x27;s good practice to always use a temporary IPv6 address.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;datatracker.ietf.org&#x2F;doc&#x2F;html&#x2F;rfc8981#name-problem-statement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;datatracker.ietf.org&#x2F;doc&#x2F;html&#x2F;rfc8981#name-problem-s...</a>

4/2/2026, 12:45:07 AM


by: apitman

Being essentially impossible to memorize is one of the worst attributes of IPv6. I memorize and manually type IPv4 addresses all the time and it&#x27;s super useful.

4/2/2026, 1:43:15 AM


by: ssl-3

I tried it. Maybe it&#x27;s easier to speak than hexadecimal is.<p>But I&#x27;m not sure that &quot;How morally the enviable assistances categorize the insistent iodine beyond new time where new systems stalk&quot; has the same memorable quality as &quot;correct horse battery staple&quot; does.

4/2/2026, 12:38:10 AM


by: Waterluvian

Something that I think was probably once obvious to me but I rediscovered recently is just how intensely wired for song the brain is. If you want to memorize anything, doing it as a song makes it far easier.<p>I’d really love to see things like this generate little jingles along with the sentence. :)

4/2/2026, 12:52:14 AM


by: Gathering6678

It reminds me of what3words, using three words to describe any location on earth. I really hoped that could catch on.

4/2/2026, 1:34:55 AM


by: buttocks

The new times take now beneath the new time while new times take the new year.<p>Or more concisely, localhost.

4/2/2026, 1:40:24 AM


by:

4/2/2026, 2:23:57 AM


by: al_borland

What is the use-case for this? I’m trying to think of an IPv6 address I would need to remember, and then when I’d have access to this site without having access to a text file where I could have noted the address down. I’m coming up empty.

4/2/2026, 1:21:47 AM


by: RedShift1

I don&#x27;t understand how the mapping works. An address has 8 parts and produces 16 words, so each part consists of 2 words. If we take the example 2a02, that gets encoded to &quot;how atop&quot;, but I don&#x27;t see how that text helps me that &quot;how atop&quot; means 2a02? Am I suppose to memorize both? How does that help?

4/2/2026, 12:49:50 AM


by: Bratmon

The new times take now beneath the new time while new times take the new time.

4/2/2026, 12:33:21 AM


by: OJFord

The first (of two) examples encodes to:<p>&gt; How now the smart flies take the new time beyond new time where new times come.<p>..Nice idea, but it may need some more thought. (Even more so as 2001:db8::1 is much easier to remember than that!) (I wrote that parenthetical from memory on edit, vs. had to copy-paste the sentence when it was my intention to comment on it within seconds.)

4/2/2026, 12:37:56 AM


by: blurrybird

Mine comes with a swear!<p>[…] thaw the new case beyond pure mass where flagrant toys fucken.

4/2/2026, 2:25:30 AM


by: Uptrenda

We kind of had the same idea for ECDSA public keys (an imagined solution to zokos triangle -- human readable and decentralized) as well as private keys (BIP39 brain wallets). Honestly it still falls short of truly name-based though.

4/2/2026, 2:00:19 AM


by: Singletail

I&#x27;m old. I can&#x27;t remember breakfast.

4/2/2026, 12:34:08 AM


by: vel0city

So just imagine if there was a service that could translate any words you wanted into the IP address instead of relying on some website to generate jibberish. Wouldn&#x27;t that be cool to use instead? Some kind of name system? Based around domains of authority?

4/2/2026, 12:55:47 AM


by: re

Not too sure of the utility of this. It&#x27;s not an <i>easy</i> sentence to remember, because while grammatical, it&#x27;s nonsense—it would take some effort. So if I&#x27;m trying to memorize a static IP, setting up a DNS name is likely to be easier. And also if I&#x27;m going to be using this to memorize IPs I&#x27;d like the algorithm to be open source.<p>All that being said, I think it&#x27;s a neat idea and a cool tool!

4/2/2026, 12:46:12 AM


by: emilfihlman

Just proves that 16 bytes was too much, and we should have just gone 8 bytes.

4/2/2026, 1:07:02 AM


by: paulsutter

ipv6 is for faceless hordes of cellphones, which could just as easily be NAT<p>despite being an ipv6 skeptic, i’ve been thinking to try using ipv6 for our new company network, but make the addresses purely readable

4/2/2026, 1:47:02 AM