DoesItAgeVerify: The age verification status of Open Source Operating Systems
by pkaeding on 3/30/2026, 12:52:06 AM
https://github.com/BryanLunduke/DoesItAgeVerify
Comments
by: gorgoiler
I read some of the Ubuntu thread about potential implementations and it sure made me pine for some rose tinted good old days when AccountsServices, xdg-portals, dbus, systemd-login, et al. weren’t things one had to know or care about. Everything seems so complicated these days.
3/30/2026, 4:09:08 AM
by: 1vuio0pswjnm7
If it's open source then the user can remove "age verification" before compiling<p>Or the user can compile a version that predates "age verification"
3/30/2026, 4:30:04 AM
by: wpollock
Age verification is simple! A Kelvar strap must be attached to the user before the device will power up. A probe in the strap takes a drop of blood from the user and analyzes the protein markers to determine the user's age. (See the Stanford U. study for details.)<p>Surprised G. Orwell or A. Huxley didn't think of it first.
3/30/2026, 3:52:13 AM
by: amarant
I... Kinda think this will work out ok? Hear me out: Linux is open source. Someone's gonna make an application/kernelmodule that lets you configure your reported age on a application/website basis.<p>In some jurisdictions it's illegal to target kids with advertisement, and I believe also to track them? Reporting your age as 8-12 is gonna be the new, but actually functional "no tracking" header.
3/30/2026, 3:22:59 AM
by: devsda
I guess this can potentially make it easy for the overzealous lawmakers & individuals harass those os/distributions to introduce age verification.<p>I prefer a satirical 'ShouldItAgeVerify' page that points the ridiculousness of shoving verification at unexpected places.
3/30/2026, 2:55:34 AM
by: ericls
lol, why not just createa law and state that "people must be happy, environment must be good, everyone must get along with everyone, also no wars".<p>Law doesn't work like this.<p>This is not law, this is impersonating God, or a bad prompt to LLM I guess.
3/30/2026, 3:46:53 AM
by: iamnothere
This seems to be a shorter list than the one collected by Ageless Linux (<a href="https://agelesslinux.org/distros.html" rel="nofollow">https://agelesslinux.org/distros.html</a>), although the GH issues seem to have the status of some additional distros.<p>See also <a href="https://github.com/AntiSurv/oss-anti-surveillance" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/AntiSurv/oss-anti-surveillance</a> for a project to patch out any future age verification code.
3/30/2026, 2:53:38 AM
by: starkeeper
So once an OS has your age then what it is just handed out to sites so they can target children for better kidnapping?
3/30/2026, 3:44:24 AM
by: tuananh
what if a distro uses systemd and systemd implements age verification?
3/30/2026, 2:56:33 AM
by: twiclo
Can anyone tell me exactly what these laws do? Is it just going to ask for a birthday when I run `adduser`? What's the point? Is it meant for one admin account to restrict other user accounts?
3/30/2026, 2:33:28 AM
by: bethekidyouwant
The browser needs to actually read this for it to be meaningful. Where is that list?
3/30/2026, 3:30:03 AM
by: kennywinker
The omarchy statement is just DHH dropping the r-word in a DM.<p>I love omarchy, but manchild/edgelord behaviour from the lead doesn’t exactly instill confidence.
3/30/2026, 2:56:33 AM